Malala Yousafzai s Autobiography I Am Malala And Nigel...

Malala Yousafzai’s memoir I am Malala and Nigel Cole’s film Made in Dagenham present strong female protagonists who speak out against the injustice of patriarchal and cultural oppression. By exploring and documenting the struggle of these extraordinary individuals who find the courage to take a committed stand against the inequity they encounter, both texts powerfully illustrate that speaking out is essential to create a better world. Furthermore, they suggest that different political and social contexts can impact the possibilities of individuals suffering harm or loss when speaking out against adversity. However, those who do speak out face many physical and emotional risks in order to receive a reward. Moreover, while Made in Dagenham†¦show more content†¦In contrast, Malala’s attempt to create social change was far more dangerous. Malala and many other girls in Pakistan are denied the right to education when the Taliban seize power in the Swat Valley , Pakistan. Malala’s struggle takes place in contemporary Pakistan where speaking out is considered very dangerous. The memoir revels the destruction of Pakistan founder, Ali Jinnah’s original vision of a ‘land of tolerance’ by increasing Islamisation; two military dictatorships ; corrupt politicians, poverty, illiteracy and the rise of the ‘forces of militancy and extremism’ exemplified by the Taliban, who was led by Maulana Fazlullah and the imposition of terror and fear under the guise of sharia law. The repression of individual freedom made people fearful to speak out. The Taliban had banned women from going ‘outside without a male relative to accompany (them)’ and told people ‘stop listening to music, watching movies and dancing’. The Taliban had ‘blown up 400 schools’ and had held public whippings demonstrated the consequences of disobedience, as did the execution of ‘infidels’ like you ng dancer, Shabana, whose body was dumped in the public square. Both texts, however more so Malala than Rita reveal that speaking out in a volatile and dangerous political environment does involve more risks, but is essential for change to occur. Both texts clearly demonstrate that speaking